|
India's Rejuvenation: Swami
Vivekananda's Vision
Swami
Atmapriyananda
1.
Preamble
Swami
Vivekananda envisioned a rejuvenated India: '… a wonderful,
glorious, future India will come. I am sure it is coming -
a greater India than ever was. … Arise, awake and see her
seated here on her eternal throne, rejuvenated, more glorious
than she ever was - this motherland of ours.' (1) Seeing the
degeneration and degradation all around - moral and spiritual
poverty, value erosion, corruption, selfish aggrandizement,
unabashed dishonesty, glorification of muscle and money power
and lack of indigenous cultural moorings, one naturally heaves
a deep sigh and wonders if Swamiji was carried away by his
innate predilection for oriental hyperbole. When will such
a glorious India come, if at all? Or is it mere wishful thinking?
We
believe that Swamiji was not only a prophet and a seer - one
who could see into the future, a trikalajna rishi
(a sage who had first-hand knowledge of the past, present
and future); he was also a scientific visionary, one who had
made a thorough, in-depth and scientific study of world history
with special reference to India. His capacious and luminous
mind could move at will over the entire gamut of world culture
and civilizations, world religions and thought currents. But
in all this, the special reference point was always India.
Mother India was the Goddess of his adoration and anything
concerning her stirred him always to an impassioned eulogy
of her past glory. Then would follow a tearful description
of her present state of utter degradation and helpless prostration
before the glamorous West. The fitting finale would be a prophetic
envisioning of India's glorious future, when his sonorous
voice would animate extraordinary pictures of her rejuvenation.
Sister Christine's remarkable reminiscences are worthy of
recollection here:
Our
love for India came to birth, I think, when we first heard
him say the word, 'India', in that marvellous voice of his.
It seems incredible that so much could have been put into
one small word of five letters. There was love, passion, pride,
longing, adoration, tragedy, chivalry, heimweh, and again
love. Whole volumes could not have produced such a feeling
in others. It had the magic power of creating love in those
who heard it. Ever after, India became the land of heart's
desire. Everything concerning her became of interest - became
living - her people, her history, architecture, her manners
and customs, her rivers, mountains, plains, her culture, her
great spiritual concepts, her scriptures. And so began a new
life, a life of study, of meditation. The centre of interest
was shifted. (2)
When
Swamiji spoke of India, it was not nationalism or patriotism
of the narrow type - my country, right or wrong. From his
deep study of world history and the rise and fall of world
civilizations, Swamiji understood the role that India was
destined to play in the comity of nations. His profound insight
revealed to him that in the great economy of God, India had
been assigned the specific and particular task of spiritualizing
humankind. In order that India may deliver this great gift
of spirituality, perform this all-important task, the vitality
of the race ought to be preserved: a vigorous, powerful India,
'rejuvenated, more glorious than she ever was', should emerge.
In his first public lecture at Colombo, soon after his triumphal
return from the West, Swamiji articulated his vision, born
of meditative insight:
Thus,
everyone born into this world has a bent, a direction towards
which he must go, through which he must live, and what is
true of the individual is equally true of the race. Each race,
similarly, has a peculiar bent, each race has a peculiar raison
d'etre, each race has a peculiar mission to fulfil in
the life of the world. Each race has to make its own result,
to fulfil its own mission. Political greatness or military
power is never the mission of our race; it never was, and,
mark my words, it never will be. But there has been the other
mission given to us, which is to conserve, to preserve, to
accumulate, as it were, into a dynamo, all the spiritual energy
of the race, and that concentrated energy is to pour forth
in a deluge on the world, whenever circumstances are propitious.
… India's gift to the world is the light spiritual. (3)
This
was why Swamiji felt so emphatically that a new India, rejuvenated
and fully awakened to her spiritual responsibility, was an
urgent necessity. For Swamiji believed that India and India
alone could discharge this vitally important responsibility:
'to conserve, to preserve, to accumulate, as it were, into
a dynamo, all the spiritual energy of the race', for the good
of the world (jagat-hitaya), 'for the good of the many,
for the happiness of the many' (bahujana hitaya, bahujana
sukhaya), as Buddha said.
The
urgency of this message cannot be felt more poignantly at
any time than now, when the whole world is in a state of panic
and anxiety. No amount of scientific and technological advancement
has been able to remove the terrifying, frightful monsters
of insecurity and fear, terror and trepidation from the hearts
of warring nations. Years ahead of the World Wars, Swamiji
predicted that the whole of the Western world was sitting
on a volcano, which needed to be quenched by the waters of
Indian spirituality:
Up,
India, and conquer the world with your spirituality! Ay, as
has been declared on this soil first, love must conquer hatred,
hatred cannot conquer itself. Materialism and all its miseries
can never be conquered by materialism. Armies when they attempt
to conquer armies only multiply and make brutes of humanity.
Spirituality must conquer the West. Slowly they are finding
out that what they want is spirituality to preserve them as
nations. They are waiting for it, they are eager for it. Where
is the supply to come from? Where are the men ready to go
out to every country in the world with the messages of the
great sages of India? Where are the men who are ready to sacrifice
everything, so that this message shall reach every corner
of the world? Such heroic souls are wanted to help the spread
of truth. Such heroic workers are wanted to go abroad and
help to disseminate the great truths of Vedanta. The world
wants it; without it the world will be destroyed. The whole
of the Western world is on a volcano, which may burst tomorrow,
go to pieces tomorrow. They have searched every corner of
the world and have found no respite. They have drunk deep
of the cup of pleasure and found it vanity. Now is the time
to work so that India's spiritual ideas may penetrate deep
into the West. … We must go out, we must conquer the world
through our spirituality and philosophy. There is no other
alternative, we must do it or die. The only condition of national
life, of awakened and vigorous national life, is the conquest
of the world by Indian thought.
At
the same time we must not forget that what I mean by the conquest
of the world by spiritual thought is the sending out of life-giving
principles, not the hundreds of superstitions that we have
been hugging to our breasts for centuries. These have to be
weeded out even on this soil, and thrown aside, so that they
may die forever. (277-8)
This,
then, is the background of Swamiji's constant emphasis on
the rejuvenation of India. This was his favourite theme and
he would return to it again and again. It moved him, on the
one hand, to heights of eloquence as seen in the passages
above; and, on the other, stirred him to the inmost depths
of his sensitive soul, crying with impatient longing for the
early rise of an awakened India, prabuddha bharata.
For he felt that if such an India failed to rise, then all
spirituality and high moral values would vanish from off the
face of the earth. 'Such a thing can never be,' he said:
Shall
India die? Then from the world all spirituality will be extinct,
all moral perfection will be extinct, all sweet-souled sympathy
for religion will be extinct, all ideality will be extinct;
and in its place will reign the duality of lust and luxury
as the male and female deities, with money as its priest,
fraud, force, and competition its ceremonies, and the human
soul its sacrifice. Such a thing can never be. (4.348)
2.
Scientific Rejuvenation
2.1
The Inner versus Outer Sciences- Lopsided Growth?
As
we have seen above, Swamiji was eager to wipe out all the
encrustations that had accumulated over the ages in the pure
and scientific religion of Vedanta, which our Indian rishis
and thinkers had propounded. He wanted to propagate a scientific,
rational and dynamic system, impersonal in nature, and therefore
acceptable to modern minds. He rediscovered the ancient theme
of our rishis, that the physical, mental and spiritual sciences
form one coherent whole. The spiritual science, the science
through which the Infinite and the Absolute, the Imperishable
(akshara) is realized was called para vidya,
while the study of the physical and mental sciences were classified
as apara vidya. The classification of knowledge into
para and apara did not indicate their superiority
or inferiority. At best it indicated a sense of priority and
at the worst a hint that the apara vidya need not (and
perhaps should not) absorb too much of one's attention, for
it does not deserve to be pursued with avidity, being ephemeral
in nature. On the other hand, a pursuit of the para vidya
confers immortality, eternal Freedom and Bliss. However, the
para vidya and the apara vidya formed one collective
and coherent whole, with the same deity Sarasvati presiding
over both. In fact, the Bhagavadgita categorically
states that complete knowledge consists in the knowledge of
the outer as well as the inner: Kshetra-kshhetrajnayor-jnanam
yat-tat jnanam matam mama. (4) Kshhetra refers
to the outer, literally, 'the field of manifestation of the
Spirit'; and kshetrajna refers to the indwelling Spirit,
literally, 'the Knower of this kshetra'. Swamiji, therefore,
wanted that India should make advances in all these sciences
- and more particularly in the sphere of physical sciences,
which had been neglected for ages thanks to an excessive and
perhaps lopsided preoccupation with the mental and spiritual
sciences. Even the study of mental science was largely eclipsed
by that of spiritual science, for the latter exercised an
overwhelming influence on the development of the former; investigations
into the mind were carried out insofar as they proved helpful
in the in-depth understanding of the secrets of the spiritual
realm. These inner sciences - mental and spiritual - being
more fascinating to the contemplative Indian mind, the outer
sciences - physical sciences - suffered quite a bit of neglect.
The best brains of the country came to be engaged in researches
into the inner sciences. Various schools of thought emerged,
and debates and discussions - what we now call symposia, colloquia,
seminars and conferences - proliferated among these schools;
so much so that illumining results emerged and were clearly
documented. The Upanishads are glorious examples of such documentation.
Commentaries (bhashyas) on these texts came to be written;
glosses (tikas) were written to explain these commentaries;
and explanatory notes (tippanis) were added to these
glosses. There was such an upsurge that mental and spiritual
wisdom became an integral part of the national psyche. Even
the so-called illiterate person with no formal education could
dilate with ease and deep understanding on many of these inner
scientific discoveries. But all this flurry of activities
was at a goodly price: the utter neglect of the outer, physical,
sciences. Explaining this absorption of the entire race with
things spiritual and therefore very subtle, Swamiji said:
There
is no end to the power a man can obtain. This is the peculiarity
of the Indian mind, that when anything interests it, it gets
absorbed in it and other things are neglected. You know how
many sciences had their origin in India. Mathematics began
there. You are even today counting 1,2,3, etc. to zero, after
Sanskrit figures, and you all know that algebra also originated
in India, and that gravitation was known to the Indian thousands
of years before Newton was born.
You
see the peculiarity. At a certain period of Indian history,
this one subject of man and his mind absorbed all their interest.
And it was so enticing, because it seemed the easiest way
to achieve their ends. Now, the Indian mind became so thoroughly
persuaded that the mind could do anything and everything according
to law, that its powers became the great object of study.
Charms, magic, and other powers, and all that were nothing
extraordinary, but a regularly taught science, just as the
physical sciences they had taught before that. Such a conviction
in these things came upon the race that physical sciences
nearly died out. It was the one thing that came before them.
Different sects of Yogis began to make all sorts of experiments.
…
The
whole idea was to get at the basis, to reach the fine parts
of the thing. And some of them really showed most marvellous
powers. … It is the extreme belief of the race. What power
is there in the hand or the sword? The power is all in the
spirit.
If
this is true, it is temptation enough for the mind to exert
its highest. But as with every other science it is very difficult
to make any great achievement, so also with this, nay much
more. Yet most people think that these powers can be easily
gained. How many are the years you take to make a fortune?
Think of that! First, how many years do you take to learn
electrical science or engineering? And then you have to work
all the rest of your life. (5)
While
appreciating and applauding the inner scientific discoveries
- advances in the mental and spiritual sciences - Swamiji
realized that the time was come to correct this lopsided growth.
Ignorance of the physical sciences engendered any number of
superstitions, which in turn adversely affected the pristine
conclusions of the mental and spiritual sciences.
Further,
Swamiji understood and felt that the Indian mind was rich
in scientific temper and outlook. If only this temper was
brought to bear upon the physical sciences, India would make
a profound advance in these outer sciences too, as much as
in the inner sciences of mind and the spirit. Indian minds
leading the computer software development technology all the
world over is a case in point.
2.2
The Guiding Scientific Principles of Indian Thought and Their
Rejuvenated Application
Swamiji
identified certain distinctive characteristics of Indian scientific
thought that enabled the Indian mind to investigate into the
inner sciences; he was convinced that these selfsame scientific
principles, when applied to the outer sciences, could unravel
many a mystery of the universe - both in the microscopic realm
of the atom and the nucleus as well as in the macroscopic
domain of the outer space, massive planets and so on. Swamiji
envisaged a rejuvenated application of these principles -
hitherto used by Indian spiritual scientists (rishis)
only in the inner scientific realm - to investigations in
the physical sciences also. Since the passing away of Swamiji,
these principles have indeed been successfully applied in
the physical sciences.
We
shall now discuss some of these principles and in fact show
specifically how the physical sciences -twentieth-century
'new physics', in particular - have, in fact, made breathtaking
discoveries through the application of these principles. All
of them, however, are subsumed in the principle of unity,
that there is an underlying unity in the midst of the apparent
diversity, which may be considered as nothing but manifestations
of the fundamental Unity.
2.2.1
The Generalization Principle
Swamiji
discovered a remarkable characteristic of the Indian mind
in its capacity to generalize - that is, to draw generalized
conclusions from particulars. Swamiji in fact called such
a mind 'courageous and wonderfully bold'; in being able to
make an intuitive leap from the particular to the general,
definitely and boldly. Elaborating his thesis, Swamiji said
in his 'Jnana Yoga' lectures:
Coming
to the principles, we find these Vedic thinkers very courageous
and wonderfully bold in propounding large and generalized
theories. Their solution of the mystery of the universe, from
the external world, was as satisfactory as it could be. The
detailed workings of modern science do not bring the question
one step nearer to solution, because the principles have failed.
If the theory of ether failed in ancient times to give a solution
of the mystery of the universe, working out the details of
that ether theory would not bring us much nearer to the truth.
If the theory of all-pervading life failed as a theory of
this universe, it would not mean anything more if worked out
in detail, for the details do not change the principle of
the universe. What I mean is that in their inquiry into the
principle, the Hindu thinkers were as bold, and in some cases,
much bolder than the moderns. They made some of the grandest
generalizations that have yet been reached, and some still
remain as theories, which modern science has yet to get even
as theories. For instance, they not only arrived at the ether
theory, but went beyond and classified mind also as a still
more rarefied ether. Beyond that again, they found a still
more rarefied ether. Yet that was no solution, it did not
solve the problem. No amount of knowledge of the external
world could solve the problem. 'But,' says the scientist,
'we are just beginning to know a little: wait a few thousand
years and we shall get the solution.' 'No,' says the Vedantist,
for he has proved beyond all doubt that the mind is limited,
that it cannot go beyond certain limits - beyond time, space,
and causation. As no man can jump out of his own self, so
no man can go beyond the limits that have been put upon him
by the laws of time and space. Every attempt to solve the
laws of causation, time, and space would be futile, because
the very attempt would have to be made by taking for granted
the existence of these three. What does the statement of the
existence of the world mean, then? 'This world has no existence.'
What is meant by that? It means that it has no absolute existence.
It exists only in relation to my mind, to your mind, and to
the mind of everyone else. We see this world with the five
senses but if we had another sense, we would see in it something
more. If we had yet another sense, it would appear as something
still different. It has, therefore, no real existence; it
has no unchangeable, immovable, infinite existence. Nor can
it be called non-existence, seeing that it exists, and we
have to work in and through it. It is a mixture of existence
and non-existence. (2.90-1)
Within
a few years of Swamiji's passing away, Einstein's relativity
theory, basing itself on the famous Michelson-Morley experiment,
dealt a deathblow to the ether theory. Our common-sense conceptions
of space and time underwent a radical change. Einstein successfully
applied the Equality Principle to discover the now famous
principle of special relativity theory that there is no preferential
frame in nature so that all laws of physical phenomena must
be invariant when referred to different frames of reference.
This Equality Principle is a particular application of a more
general principle, namely the Symmetry Principle. There is
an underlying symmetry in nature, which gives rise to the
following string of characteristics: symmetry a impartiality
a impersonality a equality (samatva). In its application
to investigation into the nature of matter, the Symmetry Principle
has led to some startling discoveries, which we will discuss
presently. It is worthwhile to note here that the Generalization
Principle and the Symmetry Principle are related to another
important principle, namely the Unification Principle.
2.2.2
The Unification Principle
The
Generalization Principle is about trying to see the particular
as a special case of the general. One simple example that
school physics would give you is that of the neutron and the
proton. These are the well-known constituents of an atomic
nucleus. The neutron, as the name implies, is neutral while
the proton is positively charged. Interestingly, both of them
are almost of the same mass. Taking this sameness as the key
to generalization, we could say that these two particles are
just two manifestations - two different charge states - of
a single particle called the 'nucleon'. A nucleon, then, can
exist in two charge states: in its positive charge state,
it is called a proton and in its neutral state, the same particle
is a neutron. Two is thus reduced to one - rather, the two
particles are unified into one. This can be viewed in terms
of the Symmetry Principle as follows: there is an underlying
symmetry into which these two particles could be subsumed
and the manifestation as two particles is simply that the
same nucleon exists in two different charge states. We could
then enlarge this concept to accommodate more particles (with
a common key, like mass in the case of the proton and the
neutron) and subsume them into a larger symmetry. Since this
symmetry is quite different from the kind of symmetry we ordinarily
see in space, we could call it some kind of internal symmetry.
Such symmetric schemes are well known in elementary particle
classification. Larger and larger unifications have been attempted
over the years by developing super-symmetric schemes. The
hope is that ultimately all particles could perhaps be considered
as the manifestation of one particle.
A
similar attempt has been made in regard to forces or interactions
found in nature. We now know that nature admits of four types
of interactions: weak, electromagnetic, strong and gravitational.
While the first three have applications in the micro-world,
gravitational force is felt predominantly only in the macro-world.
Now, the human mind seeks a generalization, a unification,
by asking the following question: Is it possible to subsume
all these forces into a single force and consider these different
forces as manifestations of that one force? Encouragingly,
we have come a fairly long way: we have been able to unify
the first three-weak, electromagnetic and strong. These are
called the Grand Unified Theories (GUTs). Unfortunately, there
is this loner: the gravitational force, which still eludes
our unification attempt. As we said earlier, whereas the first
three are quantum mechanics - dependent, owing allegiance
to the Uncertainty Principle, gravity is a 'classical' theory
- a different species altogether! Supergravity theories that
came up were at one time believed to be the right answer to
the unification of gravity with other forces, but they have
not proved satisfactory. Attempts at quantum gravity theories
are under way, but the problem appears very complex. But for
nearly two decades, the so-called String Theory has held sway,
in which the basic objects are not particles, but strings
that have length but no other dimension.
Defining
the goal of science, Swamiji said more than a hundred years
ago: 'The end and aim of all science is to find the unity,
the One out of which the manifold is being manufactured, that
One existing as many.' (1.133)
And
again:
Science
is nothing but the finding of unity. As soon as science would
reach perfect unity, it would stop from further progress,
because it would reach the goal. Thus Chemistry could not
progress farther when it would discover one element out of
which all others could be made. Physics would stop when it
would be able to fulfil its services in discovering one energy
of which all the others are but manifestations, and the science
of religion becomes perfect when it would discover Him who
is the one life in a universe of death, Him who is the constant
basis of an ever-changing world. (1.14)
In
modern times, physicists are vigorously pursuing the very
same idea to find a Unified Theory. Einstein attempted it
years ago, but in vain. This Theory of Everything (ToE) is
the Holy Grail of physics in this century. In the words of
Stephen Hawking, 'The eventual goal of science is to provide
a single theory that describes the whole universe. … And our
goal is nothing less than a complete description of the universe
we live in.' (6)
2.2.3
The Symmetry Principle
The
Symmetry Principle, based once again on the principle of unity,
has contributed considerably to the revolution of our concept
of matter at the beginning of the twentieth century. Quantum
mechanics owes its origin to this principle. The relativity
theory and quantum mechanics together wrought a thought revolution
unmatched in its profundity and power.
We
would consider two remarkable applications of this principle:
(a) wave-matter symmetry, leading to the development of quantum
mechanics or wave mechanics, and (b) microcosm-macrocosm unity,
which is the basis of many a discovery-for example, the discovery
of the Rutherford atom model (with planetary electrons) and
the General Theory of Relativity as the theory of gravitation
based on Mach's principle, leading to radical changes in our
concepts of space and matter and their interrelation.
2.2.3
(a) Wave-particle Dualism and the Development of Wave/Quantum
Mechanics
The
dawn of the twentieth century saw the birth of a remarkable
theory that revolutionized our concept of matter and radiation.
Max Planck propounded the Quantum Theory of Radiation, according
to which radiation occurs not as waves, but in discrete energy
packets (which are like particles) called 'quanta'.
The energy content of each quantum, however, is proportional
to the frequency of the radiation - the particle concept is
thus wedded to the wave concept. The quantum theory was applied
with remarkable success to a large number of phenomena like
photoelectric effect, Compton effect and Bohr atom model.
Thus quantum theory came to be established on a firm footing
as the theory of radiation. Now, these two, namely matter
and radiation, being the two fundamental manifestations of
nature, the Symmetry Principle (and the concepts arising therefrom
(symmetry a impartiality a impersonality a equality) immediately
forces us to the following conclusion: If radiation has a
particle aspect as a quantum, it should naturally follow that
matter should have a wave aspect.
Arguing
from this principle, de Broglie enunciated his startling theory
of 'matter-waves', which says that a moving particle behaves
as a wave, with a definite wavelength derivable from the particle
momentum - once again wedding the wave concept (wavelength)
with the particle concept (momentum).
Several
questions immediately came up: What is the nature of this
wave? How is this wave to be interpreted? What is its physical
significance? Two great physicists, Schrodinger and Heisenberg,
started from two points of view and then formulated a mechanics
of these waves, called wave mechanics and quantum mechanics,
respectively. These two were found to be identical except
for the language. It is now well established that all physical
phenomena in the micro-world (of the atom, nucleus, sub-nuclear
particles and so on) are governed by quantum mechanics. Soon,
Dirac and others made successful attempts to wed this to relativity;
relativistic quantum mechanics was thus born.
This
threw us back to the fundamental question: What then is a
particle? In place of talking about a particle, one then talked
about fields. These fields were then quantized to find the
particle - a recovery, as it were. Very recently, physicists
started talking about strings rather than particles. Thus
the excitement about what a particle is in the first place,
continues unabated in all its fury! On the application level,
these matter-waves were found to undergo diffraction and so
on like any other physical waves, leading to the invention
of electron microscopes with staggeringly high enlarging capabilities.
Medical science could progress by leaps and bounds thanks
to these instruments. The guiding principle of all this exercise,
however, is the Symmetry Principle.
2.2.3
(b) The Microcosm-Macrocosm Unity
One
of the earliest principles of the ancient Indian rishis in
their attempt to probe nature's mystery was the microcosm-macrocosm
unity. By applying the projection principle, projecting microcosm
on macrocosm, they were able to formulate their theories about
the cosmic phenomena. This, once again, is the well-known
psychological principle of projecting from the known to the
unknown: the microcosm is within our grasp, and since microcosm
and macrocosm are built on the same plan, projecting the former
on the latter could unravel the secrets of the macrocosm.
Several examples could be cited.
Nature
of the cosmic Person: What is the nature of the supreme, cosmic
Person? This is a question that has been engaging the attention
of thinking individuals since time immemorial. The projection
principle was applied successfully by our ancient rishis to
answer this question: projection from the individual (relatively
more known) to the cosmic (unknown). You study the individual,
the micro-person; analyse him thoroughly; then project, aspect
by aspect, to the macro-level. You then have a picture (or,
more correctly, model) of the cosmic Person.
In
analysing the individual person, our ancient rishis discovered
three levels: the gross, the subtle and the causal. The micro-aspect
of each of these levels was then related to the three states
of waking, dream and deep (dreamless) sleep. The corresponding
macro-aspects were then obtained by the micro-macro projection
principle. An important case in point: projection of the macocosmic
Virat, Hiranyagarbha and Ishvara from
the microcosmic vishva, taijasa and prajna,
corresponding respectively to the gross (waking), subtle (dream)
and causal (deep sleep) levels.
The
famous 'Purusha Sukta' gives a vivid description
of this cosmic Person, whose body is the macrocosmic counterpart
of the individual body, whose mind is the macro-mind (cosmic
Mind) - in short, whose consciousness is the cosmic Consciousness.
In
Vedanta, the micro-macro equation has come to be applied only
at the highest spiritual level. The other two levels, the
physical and mental, have found very little application. Perhaps
for the first time in the modern age, Swamiji wanted a revival
of this equation even at the physical and mental levels. Thus,
apart from the spiritual monism which Advaita Vedanta propounded,
Swamiji spoke about two other kinds of monism: monism at the
physical level and monism at the mental level. In his famous
'Paper on Hinduism' at the Parliament of Religions
in Chicago in 1893, he called these two levels of monism as
'materialistic monism' and 'philosophical monism'. (7) This
revival of physical as well as mental oneness has profound
implications for modern society. In fact, physics had shown
clearly the reality of physical oneness and Swamiji was aware
of this. Very soon after Swamiji's passing away, Einstein
propounded his Special Relativity Theory, followed by the
General Relativity Theory. The latter theory was also a theory
of gravitation. In formulating this theory, Einstein drew
great inspiration from the philosophical thought of the German
philosopher Ernst Mach. In his autobiographical sketch, Einstein
mentioned that his reading of Mach's philosophical writings
decisively furthered the critical reasoning required for the
relativity theory. He further said that his whole direction
of thinking was along the lines of Mach's thought, so that
if one considered Mach to be a precursor of the General Relativity
Theory, one would be perfectly justified. Mach's thoughts
reflect nothing but the physical monism that Swamiji spoke
about. In fact, Swamiji forcefully described this in his lecture
on 'The Mission of the Vedanta':
The
other great idea that the world wants from us today, the thinking
part of Europe, nay, the whole world - more, perhaps, the
lower classes than the higher, more the masses than the cultured,
more the ignorant than the educated, more the weak than the
strong - is that eternal grand idea of the spiritual oneness
of the whole universe. I need not tell you today, men from
Madras University, how the modern researches of the West have
demonstrated through physical means the oneness and the solidarity
of the whole universe; how, physically speaking, you and I,
the sun, moon, and stars are but little waves or wavelets
in the midst of an infinite ocean of matter; how Indian psychology
demonstrated ages ago that, similarly, both body and mind
are but mere names or little wavelets in the ocean of matter,
the Samashti; and how, going one step further, it is
also shown in the Vedanta that behind that idea of the unity
of the whole show, the real Soul is one. There is but one
Soul throughout the universe, all is but One Existence. This
great idea of the real and basic solidarity of the whole universe
has frightened many, even in this country. It even now finds
sometimes more opponents than adherents. I tell you, nevertheless,
that it is the one great life-giving idea which the world
wants from us today, and which the mute masses of India want
for their uplifting, for none can regenerate this land of
ours without the practical application and effective operation
of this ideal of the oneness of things. (3.188-9)
Swamiji's
vision of microcosm-macrocosm unity: Swamiji had a vision
of this micro-macro identity when he was meditating under
a peepul tree in Almora. Arising from this profound meditative
awareness, he recorded his experience in his diary. An English
rendering of what he noted down in Bengali runs as follows:
In
the beginning was the Word etc.
The
microcosm and the macrocosm are built on the same plan. Just
as the individual soul is encased in the living body, so is
the universal Soul in the Living Prakriti [Nature] - the objective
universe. Shiva [i.e. Kali] is embracing Shiva: this is not
a fancy. This covering of the one [Soul] by the other [Nature]
is analogous to the relation between an idea and the word
expressing it: they are one and the same; and it is only by
a mental abstraction that one can distinguish them. Thought
is impossible without words. Therefore, in the beginning was
the Word etc.
This
dual aspect of the Universal Soul is eternal. So what we perceive
or feel is this combination of the Eternally Formed and the
Eternally Formless. (9.291)
This
scientific principle of micro-macro projection that Swamiji
actually saw in an intuitive vision, he was boldly applying
even in the socio-politic realm. We refer to his statement
quoted at the very beginning: 'Thus, everyone born into this
world has a bent, a direction towards which he must go, through
which he must live, and what is true of the individual is
equally true of the race.'
Swamiji
was here relying upon this scientific principle of projection,
which has been responsible for many a path-breaking discovery
in physical science. We see here two more examples.
Rutherford
atom model: It is well known in the history of atomic
physics how Rutherfold arrived at his nuclear atom model.
From large-angle scattering of alpha particles, he had come
to a definite conclusion that the entire positive charge of
the atom is concentrated in a very minute region inside it.
This he called the 'nucleus'. The next question was, how are
the negative charges distributed around the nucleus? When
no amount of speculation worked, he applied, in a stroke of
intuitive genius, the above micro-macro projection principle,
albeit in the reverse order. He projected the sun onto the
nucleus, and then the various planets revolving round the
sun in elliptical orbits automatically got projected on to
the negatively charged electrons. This projection gave him
immediately the 'planetary electrons', with the electrons
revolving round the nucleus very much like the planets round
the sun. On application of Planck's quantum theory, the experimental
match was immediate and more or less accurate. When the fine
structure of spectral lines was discovered, Sommerfeld once
again used the projection principle with success: these planetary
electrons were revolving in elliptical orbits, and relativistic
variation of their mass with velocity needed to be applied.
When the hyperfine structure of the spectral lines came up,
the theory was further refined: once again the projection
principle - look at the macrocosm and project backward to
the microcosm. The concept of electron spin, like the internal
rotation of the planets, was introduced and the experimental
match obtained. Then came space quantization by the application
of the same principle, and so on.
The
projection principle is used above as an analogy to understand
the unknown from the known. The other example is the nuclear
structure. We briefly discuss it below.
Liquid
drop model/Shell model of nucleus: The answer to the question
of what the nuclear structure was like came once again from
an analogy: from the known to the unknown. Two models of the
nucleus are well known: the liquid drop model and the shell
model. The liquid drop model came from drawing the analogy
of the liquid drop to the nucleus - each force in the liquid
drop was correspondingly projected. From this, Weiszacker
arrived at a formula called the 'semi-empirical mass formula'.
Interestingly, it was this formula that gave the precise reasoning
and information about nuclear fission and the consequent release
of enormous amounts of nuclear energy. This phenomenon of
nuclear fission was used to manufacture atomic and nuclear
bombs for destructive purposes on the one hand, and to make
nuclear reactors for constructive purposes on the other. It
is interesting how this simple principle of projection (analogy)
could become responsible for the release of astounding amounts
of nuclear energy due to fission. Such is the power of thought!
It
is interesting to note that this projection principle was
known to and used by the ancient Indian rishis ages ago. And
Swamiji was keen to revive the scientific temper of our ancients
and bring about a rejuvenated application of this temper.
2.2.3
(c) Symmetry and Conservation Principles
We
could briefly mention here the crucial role played by what
is known as the principle of conservation and discuss its
relation to symmetry. Conservation of certain well-known physical
quantities is the bedrock of science; conservation of mass-energy
and conservation of linear and angular momentum are too well
known. Now, there exists an intimate connection between symmetry
and conservation (invariance) laws. This connection is embodied
in what is known as Noether's Theorem. In the micro-world-the
sub-atomic realm of elementary particles - the charge (C)
conservation, left-right (parity) symmetry (P) and time-reversal
symmetry (T) have played a vital role in our understanding,
leading to what is called the CPT theorem.
Swamiji
has tried to apply the principle of conservation to socio-political
situations and tried to derive some remarkable conclusions.
The intimate connection between symmetry and conservation
could be invoked to reinforce his theses and enunciate generalized
theorems in the socio-political sphere. While a detailed discussion
of this topic is beyond the scope of this paper, we mention
this just to show how Swamiji wanted scientific principles
to be applied to society as well: for all human existence
forms one coherent whole.
3.
Conclusion
The
scientific rejuvenation in Swamiji's vision of a rejuvenated
India, therefore, is twofold: (1) the revivification of the
fundamental scientific principles discovered by our ancient
rishis, and (2) the practical application of these principles
to every department of human activity and every sphere of
human endeavour - in one word, their application in everyday
life, for universal well-being.
Swamiji
has identified some of these fundamental principles, like
the ones mentioned above, the most fundamental, according
him, being the solidarity or oneness of the universe. He called
these 'life-giving principles'. It behoves us, then, to: (1)
discover what these principles are (apart from the ones Swamiji
himself mentions specifically); (2) reverentially contemplate
them to find out how they could be applied to every department
of human activity and to every sphere of human endeavour,
for the welfare of the entire humankind; and (3) Test their
effectiveness by actual application, individually and collectively.
If
we, as a nation, apply ourselves to this noble task, realizing
the power of thought in bringing about individual and collective
welfare, social change and uplift, India could hope, in the
not-too-distant future, to become a superpower - not for bullying
other nations or for bulldozing them to accept our own ways
of thinking or to dominate over them, but for establishing
a reign of peace and blessedness. The great treasures in the
form of 'life-giving principles' and powerful ideas that we
have inherited from our forefathers in this blessed land should
be spread broadcast all over the world. Swamiji's prophetic
utterance in this context should fill us with fresh zeal and
redoubled energy to accomplish this task:
For
a complete civilization the world is waiting, waiting for
the treasures to come out of India, waiting for the marvellous
spiritual inheritance of the race, which, through decades
of degradation and misery, the nation has still clutched to
her breast. The world is waiting for that treasure; little
do you know how much of hunger and of thirst there is outside
of India for these wonderful treasures of our forefathers.
We talk here, we quarrel with each other, we laugh at and
we ridicule everything sacred, till it has become almost a
national vice to ridicule everything holy. Little do we understand
the heart-pangs of millions waiting outside the walls, stretching
forth their hands for a little sip of that nectar which our
forefathers have preserved in this land of India. (3.317)
If
only we could deeply share this agony that Swamiji felt, and
awaken without delay to this enormous national responsibility,
a rejuvenated India of Swamiji's dreams would become a reality.
The entire world is waiting with bated breath, anxiety and
panic writ large in its wrinkled forehead, for peace and blessedness.
It is India, and only India, that can create such an atmosphere
of peace and benediction. For it is from India that noble
ideas, powerful thought currents, expressive of joy and immortality,
have emanated since time immemorial: '… ideas after ideas
have marched out from her, but every word has been spoken
with a blessing behind it and peace before it.' (3.106)
May
we endeavour tirelessly to actualize Swamiji's dream of a
rejuvenated India; and may the entire world be deluged with
the waves of love, peace and benediction flowing out from
this rejuvenated, glorious India, as from an eternal spring.
References
1.
The Complete Works of Swami Vivekananda, 9 vols. (Calcutta:
Advaita Ashrama, 1-8, 1989; 9, 1997), 3.154.
2.
His Eastern and Western Admirers, Reminiscences of Swami
Vivekananda (Calcutta: Advaita Ashrama,1999), 151.
3.
CW, 3.108-9.
4.
Bhagavadgita, 13.2.
5.
CW, 2.20-2.
6.
Stephen W. Hawking, A Brief History of Time (London:
Bantam, 1989), 10, 13.
7.
CW, 1.8.
|