|
Editorial
The
Contemplative Mood
The
Vedas conjure up in our minds visions of seers immersed in
contemplation, of rishis engaged in fire-sacrifices, of priests
filling the air with their melodious chants, and of teachers
expounding the knowledge of Brahman to eager students. Men
and women intermingling freely with devas and devis, with
yakshas, gandharvas, and other celestial beings crowd our
imagination when we attempt a glimpse into the Vedic realm.
The
Vedas are the repository of supersensory knowledge, so our
vision of the Vedic world is not likely to be dominated by
the commonplace. But this imagined world is also a distant
entity, difficult to reify in contemporary circumstances.
For we live in a world from which gods and angels seem to
have been exorcised as much as ghosts, wherein the supersensory
has become synonymous with the imaginary.
The
Power of Imagination
Imagining
the real and realizing the imagined are central to the contemplative
process. Imagination powers all creativity. Even the mundane
tasks of daily living, when carried out imaginatively, turn
into creative acts. It is imagination that results in the
insights that lead to scientific discovery, the production
of artistic masterpieces, revolutions in religious and social
life, and daring displays of sporting brilliance. It is imagination
again, when
turned morbid, that results in unimaginable acts of cruelty
and violence. Imagination clearly has both a life and a power
of its own.
Imagination
involves the formation of mental images and associations that
are not directly or immediately available to the senses. Normally
our thought world is being constantly bombarded by such images
and associations derived from the subconscious mind. In his
commentary on the Yoga Sutra, Maharshi Vyasa cites
seven ‘unperceived’ (aparidrsta) functions of the mind,
which essentially delineate the way the subconscious mind
functions: ‘Nirodhadharmasamskarah parinamo’tha jivanam,
cesta saktisca cittasya dharma darsanavarjitah; Suppression
(of thoughts or mental modifications), seeds of action and
memory traces (loosely called samskara), (internal)
transformation, life (movement of prana), activity (which
makes the senses function), and (psychic) powers constitute
the unseen or subconscious characteristics of the mind.’ Vasanas
or memory traces are responsible for the images that keep
flitting across our minds. Often these tend to coalesce into
vivid associations - our fancies and fantasies. But they take
a more concrete shape when they rouse up and get linked to
karma-samskaras (more commonly termed karmsaya),
the residues of previous actions (our habits) impelling
us to act on our fantasies.
The
mind also has its conscious (paridrsta) component (and
this alone is what we are aware of) which can choose to structure
or guide the vrttis (mental modifications) sprouting
from the unconscious, giving them direction and coherence.
And this is what we call imaginative thinking.
The
unconscious is not, however, merely a seething cauldron of
dark desires and passions as we often imagine it to be. Being
the seat of prana (lifeforce) as well as cesta and
sakti (the mental forces), it is the repository of
all our powers - the dynamo that drives all psychophysical
activity. And it is for us to choose how we channelize and
utilize this power.
If
our imaginings are derived from the unconscious, it is our
beliefs and imaginations that in turn structure the unconscious.
This is because our beliefs determine the way we act, and
it is repeated action that forms habits. The workings of the
subconscious are usually represented in our mind as images
(termed primary process) in contrast to the more elaborate
rational and language-dependent secondary process of the conscious
mind. The images we send down into our subconscious therefore
determine the way the subconscious powers our actions.
The
subconscious is also not a closed personal chamber. The element
of shakti (psychic power) structured into the subconscious
enables it to tune itself to other psyches as well as to the
natural intelligence inherent in the cosmos. More importantly,
the subconscious has the ability to hold itself in abeyance
- a capacity termed nirodha - which allows the light
of the superconscious to shine freely through our being. Images
(and sound symbols) again are what help us tap these powers.
It is for this reason that successful contemplation is also
successful imagination.
The
Vedic world was no less human than the world of today. But
even the best historical efforts to reconstruct this distant
world are likely to border on the imaginary. The vision captured
in the Vedas, however, is there for each one of us to recreate
in our imagination and realize in the depths of our being.
This realization depends as much on the knowledge of our own
selves as on the knowledge of the Vedas.
Emotional
Solitude
The
creative imagination that opens the doors to the superconscious
is no ordinary imagination. It requires that the instinctual
forces of the samskaras be attenuated and greater control
be obtained over mental processes. The prime requirement for
this attenuation of samskaras is isolation from emotional
surges, for it is these surges of attachment, hatred, and
selfishness (technically termed klesas) that give life
to the samsakaras. This ‘emotional solitude’ is therefore
a prerequisite for the contemplative life. It is also termed
brahmacharya - ‘the ideal of the life of the student,
with its mingling of solitude, austerity, and intense concentration
of thought’.
A
true contemplative, by the very virtue of brahmacharya, is
also a student. And it is Goddess Saraswati who is the deity
of the student. Sister Nivedita points out that Swami Vivekananda
believed this ‘worship of Saraswati - by which he meant perfect
emotional solitude and self-restraint’, was ‘an essential
preparation for any task demanding the highest powers, whether
of heart, mind, or body. Such worship had been recognized
in India for ages as part of the training of the athlete,
and the significance of this fact was that a man must dedicate
all the force at his disposal, if he were now and again to
reach that height of superconscious insight, which appears
to others as illumination, inspiration, or transcendental
skill. Such illumination was as necessary to the highest work
in art or science, as in religion.’
Is
brahmacharya then some sort of self-deprivationor emotional
drought, or an antisocial attitude? Our emotions, after all,
are an integral part of our being, and form the very basis
of social interaction. And if we are to believe Sigmund Freud,
‘to love and to work’ is the ultimate the human being can
hope for.
In
the company of Swami Vivekananda, Sister Nivedita recalls,
‘it was impossible to think with respect of a love that sought
to use, to appropriate, to bend to its own pleasure
or good, the thing loved. Instead of this, love, to be love
at all, must be a welling benediction, a free gift, “without
a reason”, and careless of return. This was what he meant,
by his constant talk of “loving without attachment”.’ ‘Love
is always a manifestation of bliss,’ Swamiji said in England,
‘the least shadow of pain falling upon it, is always a sign
of physicality and selfishness.’
It
is this physicality and selfishness that the contemplative
wishes to transcend. It is brahmacharya, therefore, that sets
the mood for effective contemplation.
|